shí ròu zé fù
Also rendered: eating meat brings relapse (Keeps 則 as consequence; 復 as relapse) · meat causes recurrence (Flatter; loses the conditional shape of the line)
Reviewed · 2026-09
At a glance
The dietary prohibition with which chapter 31 closes its discussion of convalescence: when the heat disease is a little better, eating meat brings relapse and eating much leaves residue. The two halves forbid different things — one a kind of food, one a quantity — and together they complete the chapter’s account of why heat diseases linger. The mechanism has already been given: while heat is stored, grain qi and it press against each other and two heats join. Meat is hard to transform and feeding is easy to overdo, so both reignite what was settling.
Passages where the term does real work, with the original, pinyin and English on the same line.
Every rendering below is a decision about which reader is being addressed. There is no neutral option.
| Wiseman & Feng | eating meat causes a return of the disease | They keep the conditional shape, but 'return of the disease' is longer than 復 and reads like a description rather than a warning. |
| Unschuld | (if he) eats meat, (the disease) will recur | Unschuld makes the condition explicit with 'if', which is right in sense but adds a conjunction the Chinese does without. |
| This site | eating meat brings relapse | We keep 則 as 'brings' and 復 as relapse. The line is a prohibition written as a consequence, and both the brevity and the conditional shape are part of its force. |
Search the glossary
Reading path
Guided routes through the corpus, each built on a handful of chapters and their key terms.
See all reading paths